PaymentsJournal
SUBSCRIBE
  • Analysts Coverage
  • Truth In Data
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Industry Opinions
  • News
  • Resources
No Result
View All Result
PaymentsJournal
  • Analysts Coverage
  • Truth In Data
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Industry Opinions
  • News
  • Resources
No Result
View All Result
PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result

What’s Behind Open Banking’s Slow Burn in the U.S.?

Duncan Barrigan by Duncan Barrigan
September 8, 2021
in Featured Content, Industry Opinions, Open Banking
0
What’s Behind Open Banking’s Slow Burn in the U.S.?

What’s Behind Open Banking’s Slow Burn in the U.S.?

0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

The niche world of payments has been making headline news this year, particularly when it comes to open banking. First there was the widely-publicized collapse of Visa’s $5.3 billion bid to buy Plaid in January, followed by its subsequent $2.2 billion move to acquire Tink, announced this summer.

Then the Biden administration issued an executive order on July 9 encouraging the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) to create rules that make it easier for consumers to transfer bank account data across financial institutions. That data transfer — where competitive third-party providers, with customer consent, access bank account data through APIs — is fundamental to open banking’s widespread adoption. The APIs enable those providers to offer new financial services and products with fast, elegant user experiences.

Two things are abundantly clear from these developments: the American government strongly supports the competition that open banking is designed to spark, and it’s starting to take a more active role in fostering this. But, while it seems like the dream is coming into focus, reality is more complicated. The U.S. financial landscape is tangled, and the regulatory push that now seems hopeful may take years to achieve amid the nation’s intense economic and political divisions.

Open banking’s slow burn in the U.S. could become a transforming conflagration for the financial sector, but the superpower must first find a way through at least three major challenges.

A tangle of closed systems

American businesses and consumers currently use an unruly mix of legacy and emerging technologies to make payments and manage money, largely driven by diverse private sector interests. First, there are credit cards, ubiquitous with their high fee structures for merchants and consumers. Debit cards are tremendously popular, too, and like credit cards, carry merchant transaction fees, albeit cheaper ones.

For several years, fintechs have offered low- to no-fee, instant money transfer and management options but have mostly leveraged screen scraping to do it. That process, which forces customers to hand over log-in credentials to third-party providers, can make sensitive data more vulnerable to fraudsters if it’s poorly managed. In the last couple of years, banks and fintech providers have rolled out partner APIs, generally more secure than screen scraping but created in a closed way by myriad private agreements within the U.S. financial sector. ACH partner APIs are now abundant, but most are new, and they vary in quality.

And what about instant, no-fee bank-to-bank money transfer apps? Zelle, owned by seven American banking giants, reminds customers that different banks have different rules regarding protections and amounts and whether small businesses can even enroll.

These myriad, industry-led approaches all exist in a context of enormous scale. The mix and the sheer size of the U.S. banking and financial services sector — the number of bank ecosystems, range of business and technical processes, variety of payment and account instruments, and individualized rules crafted within complex partner contracts — slow U.S. open banking adoption.

A lack of potent federal regulation

While the Biden executive order is a start, there’s a long road ahead for the U.S. to reach the comprehensive regulatory protections of consumer data established by Europe’s GDPR and protection of open banking competition embedded in PSD2. Both laws have provided certainty for businesses operating in the European market, not to mention pressure to get things right with secure, widely available, standardized open APIs. Asia-Pacific banks, businesses and consumers, too, have benefited heavily from Singapore’s legislation and the taxonomy of bank API functionalities — largely considered the region’s ‘gold standard’ — published by its MSA.

Meanwhile, while starting to talk a good game around regulation, the U.S. has in recent years largely deferred to the private sector to negotiate conflicts over consumer data — without consumers in the equation. GDPR’s global popularity and the lack of a comparable U.S. federal law have helped reveal how little practical power Americans have over their own financial data. The faster the U.S. government can provide certainty for business around the rules for competition and data protection, the faster open banking will be adopted.

A need to educate consumers

A 2021 Financial Behavior Survey from GoCardless of 1,000 consumers revealed that 70% of Americans have never heard of “open banking” per se. But, when they understood its meaning, over half (54%) of Americans said they are willing to provide financial information if it means a faster, more seamless checkout experience, with Millennials especially willing at 73%. Like many technologies, the average Joe won’t care about how clever it is — the key is educating the public on which problems open banking can solve.

As consumers learn more, they also will demand better practices. Outside of the financial industry, few Americans know the difference between screen scraping technology and standardized open APIs. But the tide may be turning, and demand for APIs will likely increase as consumers hear about its benefits.

The U.S. government, fintechs and banks together should direct their energy to meet each of these challenges creatively. Those developing open banking are carrying the torch of global finance forward into a more connected, data-driven future.

Tags: Closed-loopdata sharingIndustry OpinionsOpen APIOpen Bankingregulation
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

    Analyst Coverage, Payments Data, and News Delivered Daily

    Sign up for the PaymentsJournal Newsletter to get exclusive insight and data from Mercator Advisory Group analysts and industry professionals.

    Must Reads

    cross-border payments

    Cross-Border Payments: Fighting
    E-Commerce Fraud Using Data

    March 20, 2023
    fraud, ChatGPT-4

    How to Fight Fraud While Still Enabling a Great Online Customer Experience

    March 17, 2023
    RTP

    Financial Institutions Without an RTP Strategy Risk Being Left Behind

    March 16, 2023
    visa chargeback

    New Visa Chargeback Guidelines Will Be a Game Changer

    March 15, 2023
    liquidity management

    Liquidity Management Takes on Increasing Importance in Uncertain Economic Times

    March 14, 2023
    payments

    Key Challenges from Growing Payment Methods and Volume

    March 13, 2023
    Data Governance is a Journey, financial data

    How FIs Can Power Their Operations with a Modern Data Architecture

    March 10, 2023
    ISO 20022

    How Banks Can Realize Business Benefits and Reduce Payments Fraud With ISO 20022

    March 9, 2023

    Linkedin-in Twitter

    Advertise With Us | About Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Subscribe
    ©2023 PaymentsJournal.com

    • Analysts Coverage
    • Truth In Data
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    Menu
    • Analysts Coverage
    • Truth In Data
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Industry Opinions
    • Recent News
    • Resources
    Menu
    • Industry Opinions
    • Recent News
    • Resources
    • Analysts Coverage
    • Truth In Data
    • Podcasts
    • Industry Opinions
    • Faster Payments
    • News
    • Jobs
    • Events
    No Result
    View All Result