PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result
SIGN UP
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
PaymentsJournal
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
No Result
View All Result
PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result

Sezzle Gets Back Into Action With California Regulator’s Approval

By Brian Riley
January 17, 2020
in Analysts Coverage, Compliance and Regulation, Digital Assets & Crypto, Emerging Payments, Fintech
0
4
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on LinkedIn

Last week, we reported that Sezzle’s ability to lend in California was over as the California Department of Business Oversight rejected their lending license application.  The decision has since been reversed, as Reuters indicated this morning:

The California Department of Business Oversight (DBO) initially rejected Sezzle’s license application last month after calling out the firm for making “illegal unlicensed lending” in the state. It said on Thursday that Sezzle would have to refund $282,000 to Californian consumers and pay a $28,200 penalty.

Sezzle Inc said on Friday that a Californian regulator had approved its application for a lending license, sending its shares sharply higher, although the approval came with a fine and a rap on the knuckles over previously charged loan fees.

The license now allows Sezzle to structure its credit offerings directly to consumers, removing merchants from the process.

Shares in the company soared 26% to A$2.23 in Australia on Friday, their highest level since mid-December.

The state-capital based Sacramento Business Journal summarized the events:

Sezzle began offering its service in California without a lending license. The DBO determined Sezzle was making unregulated loans to California consumers in violation of the California Financing Law, the DBO said in its opinion in December.

Even though the consumer doesn’t pay interest if they follow the payment plan, they are still getting a money advance, and under California law, that is a loan, according to the DBO’s opinion.

“This happens all the time. A new service comes along, and they say ‘this changes everything,’ but it doesn’t,” department spokesman Mark Leyes said. “If you buy something over time, that is a loan.”

What is more interesting in this issue is how the state of California is broadening its reach into consumer finance, claiming to fill a void from the CFPB.

As part of his new budget proposal, Gov. Gavin Newsom is calling for the state’s financial regulator to expand its reach and to enforce the regulations of the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Under the proposal, the state’s Department of Business Oversight would be renamed the Department of Financial Protection and Innovation and would get a larger budget and more staff, possibly in Sacramento, to enforce the tenets of the CFPB.

The restructuring is meant to allow the state to enforce financial protections that have been rolled back by the Trump administration. The new department’s budget would get an additional $10.2 million this year for 44 new positions, growing to $19.3 million in the 2022-23 fiscal year, representing 90 positions. The department currently has just under 700 employees.

But for Sezzle, they are back into the market to face off with lenders such as Walmart’s preferred vendor in the space, Affirm.  Plenty of competition is brewing, as we covered in our recent viewpoint. “Credit Card Lenders: Hone Strategies and Do Not Let Fintechs Scare You.”  Fintech may be exciting, but lenders still need compliance guardrails to stay out of trouble.

Overview by Brian Riley, Director, Credit Advisory Service at Mercator Advisory Group

4
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on LinkedIn
Tags: CaliforniaCompliance and RegulationLendingSezzle

    Get the Latest News and Insights Delivered Daily

    Subscribe to the PaymentsJournal Newsletter for exclusive insight and data from Javelin Strategy & Research analysts and industry professionals.

    Must Reads

    identity theft protection services

    The Missing Piece in Banks’ Identity Protection Strategy

    July 24, 2026
    African cross-border payments

    Africa’s Payment Problem Isn’t What You Think It Is

    July 23, 2026
    remittance platform

    The Case for Not Building Your Own Remittance Stack

    July 22, 2026
    instant payments fraud, business payments

    When Faster Isn’t Better: The New Rules of Business Payments

    July 21, 2026
    Gen Z banking

    For Gen Z, Banking Loyalty Begins with Payments

    July 20, 2026
    syria visa mastercard

    Visa’s Stablecoin Platform Marks the Next Phase of Digital Payments

    July 17, 2026
    cross-border payments

    Beyond Pix: The Cross-Border Layer Latin America Is Building Next

    July 16, 2026
    digital euro

    Can the Digital Euro Be the Difference Maker the EU Needs?

    July 15, 2026

    Linkedin-in X-twitter
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter

    ©2026 PaymentsJournal.com |  Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

    • Commercial Payments
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    No Result
    View All Result